Illegal drugs have overwhelmed the world with their poisonous tentacles. Drug abuse and control is so common now that you would be hard pushed to find a state that is drug-free. You can also look for 247lawsuitnews to get the latest update on drug arrests.
However, in order to warrant an arrest, the specialists must have probable cause before beginning any action. Plain suspicion or belief without supporting facts isn’t grounds for an arrest.
For example, the police aren’t certified to search a person or property to make a narcotics arrest just because they believe that person to be embarrassed of possession. They will first have to have supportive facts or authentic reasons to make an arrest. This is because the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution allows for citizens ‘to be secure’ in their homes, possessions and persons. A violation of this alteration can give persons a basis to file lawsuits.
This is because the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution allows for citizens ‘to be secure’ in their homes, possessions and persons. A violation of this alteration can give persons a basis to file lawsuits.
In order to make drug arrests, officers can make use of sound informant narcotic arrest procedures. Here, a confidential informant may provide real proof that the suspect is leading illegal drug activities. But while the use of informers can greatly support in identifying a suspect, procedures must be followed carefully.
Firstly, the identity of the informer must be kept private and can be revealed only if an official or judge orders it to be so. Second, the information given by the informant must be authenticated by another witness. Information consists of eye witness accounts, background information, identities of witnesses and narcotic activity or activities of the suspect.
Third, if the informer was once a criminal, then he or she must stop any criminal activity and must not come into harm or cause someone else to come into harm during the course of the investigation. In order to make a narcotics arrest, a prosecutor must have another person present while interviewing the informant.